[1496/6/1]*[print] [email] [cite] [preceding] [following]
†The lords sat after noon, [William Elphinstone], bishop of Aberdeen, [William Wawane], official of Lothian, [John Drummond], lord Drummond, [William Borthwick, lord] Borthwick, John Ogilvy of Fingask, James Douglas and James Scrimgeour
In the presence of the lords auditors Master Gavin [...] compeared [as] procurator for William Keith of Inverugie, and protested that where he produced a letter of tack from the late Sir Gilbert Keith of Inverugie of the lands of Pittenheath, lying within the barony of Inverugie and sheriffdom of [...], the said lands and no other right, that therefore in production [...] regarding the said lands should not be admitted.
[1496/6/2]*[print] [email] [cite] [preceding] [following]
†In the presence of the lords auditors David Balfour of [...] compeared for Margaret Hay, lady of Philorth, and protested that whatever is done in the matter moved between William Inverugie and John Scott regarding the lands of Pittenheath and all other matters contained in the summons [...] persons in the same should not prejudice him [...] to the said lands and all other actions contained in the said summons.
[1496/6/3]*[print] [email] [cite] [preceding] [following]
†In the presence of the lords auditors David Balfour of [... ... ...] compeared as procurator for Margaret, lady Philorth, and requested an act that William Keith of Inverugie alleged that the said Margaret was his tenant of the lands of Middle Essie, Pittenheath, with their pertinents, according to the form of a decreet given by the lords of council for that.
[1496/6/4]*[print] [email] [cite] [preceding] [following]
†The lords auditors decree and deliver [that] for all that they have so far seen that Robert Murray, dwelling in Fossywal, shall desist and cease from [... ... ...] manuring of land and a tenement with a croft of the [... ... ...] between the lands called Edgar's croft on the east part and the croft of Robert Bernard on the west part, to be used and enjoyed by John Tulloch according to the form of the testimonial of [... ... ...] under the seals of Robert Gaw and [...] Johnson, bailies of the said burgh, shown and produced before the lords; and [they] appoint 11 October next, with continuation of days, for the said John Tulloch to prove sufficiently that the said Robert Murray has occupied the said lands and for how long, and the profit and values of it, and ordain him to have letters to summon his witnesses and the party to hear them sworn; and the said Robert is adjudged by the said lords with a fine of 40s because he was summoned to this action, often called and did not compear, and ordain our sovereign lord's letters be directed for this; and the said Robert Murray was summoned to this action, often called and did not compear, etc.
[1496/6/5]*[print] [email] [cite] [preceding] [following]
In the presence of the lords auditors James Haldane of Keillour compeared and protested that because George Currour of Logie-Meigle caused him to be summoned to his suit in certain actions, as is contained in the summons, and would not compear to pursue him, that therefore, etc.
[1496/6/6]*[print] [email] [cite] [preceding] [following]
Before the lords auditors William Mailine of Carnbee compeared and protested that because Alexander Bruce of Bridgehome, knight, caused him to be summoned to his suit for actions, as is contained in the summons, and would not compear to pursue him, that therefore, etc.
[Council proceedings]†